From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25299 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-agent-expire Date: 25 Sep 1999 08:37:56 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162709 13245 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:11:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA09154 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 02:47:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB20495; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 01:47:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 25 Sep 1999 01:47:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA13709 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 01:46:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (sparky.gnus.org [193.69.4.146]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA09088 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 02:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA30700; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 08:47:28 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Coil's _Musick to Play in the Dark (Vol 1)_: "Red Queen" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Robert Epprecht's message of "27 Aug 1999 20:25:05 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > > If I do 'M-x gnus-agent-expire' I thought that all read articles > > > older than gnus-agent-expire-days would be expired, but I just > > > discovered, that this seems not to be the case here. > > > > Well, age is here computed from when the articles were slurped into > > the Agent. Could that explain what you're seeing? > > No, they were downloaded and read months ago. I've had a peek at my Agent directories, and they don't seem to contain any ancient articles. Months ago... Could it be that the articles were downloaded before the Agent makeover? The structure of the history file and stuff changed a while back. Articles that arrived before that time are ignored by the expiry process, I think. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen