From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24097 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Future feature: Gzip of nnfolders? Date: 09 Jul 1999 16:16:42 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161724 6893 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA27615 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB23465; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:17:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 15:17:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16702 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:17:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from peorth.gweep.net (ratinox@adhara.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.158]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA27607 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:16:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by peorth.gweep.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) id QAA07050; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:16:44 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: Jonas Steverud's message of "09 Jul 1999 21:25:41 +0200" Original-Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) XEmacs/21.1 (Arches) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24097 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24097 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Jonas Steverud on Fri, 09 Jul 1999 | No. It did not when I tried earlier this summer/in the | spring. Therefore I asked. I'll give it a new shot Later(TM). | If I fail (again) I'll come back. Thanks. It might be necessary to specify the compression extension in the group parameters. Have you done that? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v0.9.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE3hliqgl+vIlSVSNkRAmolAJ9NLZgKGXfa5D4230h4GP2DKBLk2ACg+Bo/ gKEiTL5IhhLsp7hOtKIwh4o= =qRl+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete. Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ PGP Key: at a key server near you! \