message-position-on-field, push-mark

message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Philipp Haselwarter]

Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
`push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.
Just a thought…

-- 
Philipp Haselwarter

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Philipp Haselwarter <philipp.haselwarter@gmx.de> writes:

> Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
> `push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
> could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.

`message-position-on-field' isn't a command, but a function used
internally by other commands, so it would be inappropriate for it to
push the mark.

But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
friends) to push the mark...  What do people think?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:01:22 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: 

LMI> Philipp Haselwarter <philipp.haselwarter@gmx.de> writes:
>> Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
>> `push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
>> could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.

LMI> `message-position-on-field' isn't a command, but a function used
LMI> internally by other commands, so it would be inappropriate for it to
LMI> push the mark.

LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
LMI> friends) to push the mark...  What do people think?

I'd be OK with that.

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
> LMI> friends) to push the mark...  What do people think?
>
> I'd be OK with that.

It's a "new feature", though, so it'll have to wait...

I think we'll have to open a new branch soon, or I'll go insane.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:20:45 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: 

LMI> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
LMI> friends) to push the mark...  What do people think?
>> 
>> I'd be OK with that.

LMI> It's a "new feature", though, so it'll have to wait...

LMI> I think we'll have to open a new branch soon, or I'll go insane.  :-)

Yeah, make your own branch, go wild.  It's really easy and cheap to
manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.

Ted

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> Yeah, make your own branch, go wild.  It's really easy and cheap to
> manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.

I think the way to proceed is to create a No Gnus branch (for bug
fixes), and then continue development on the trunk.  Perhaps.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no  *  Sent from my Rome

Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:01:01 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: 

LI> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> Yeah, make your own branch, go wild.  It's really easy and cheap to
>> manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.

LI> I think the way to proceed is to create a No Gnus branch (for bug
LI> fixes), and then continue development on the trunk.  Perhaps.

Works For Me.

Ted