From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73410 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Splitting rules Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:56:46 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <8762wwh7ts.fsf@corwin.home.thebuble.org> <87eibjfw0x.fsf@corwin.home.thebuble.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287677072 18605 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 16:04:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:04:32 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21782@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 21 18:04:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8xd0-0005Ms-Pn for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:04:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P8xcz-0004RL-EZ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P8xcx-0004R2-O6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P8xcs-0006b1-L5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P8xcr-0000en-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:04:21 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8xcr-0005KP-Ib for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:04:21 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:04:21 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:04:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEXi4uH08+zFw73e3d/9 /fz49/ceFw2bnJhlYVvW1tfMzM3////+//7o5+Xb297u7upb57v3AAACKklEQVQ4jZWTMYgTQRSG RwThWMJhcVisQRiL41aR4DaKEjjIVVNoMFvIEO1iuEqCMLmAhXqYtbJTYjCF2GRtbu92UHkr21gI G+EsBHW9Ko1yIh5y1Rbnm2zUXMxdzM/C8uab9968N2+I0+ir9b0n0+yaKEIcVLuBX6PVSoBpnhHX EdSFqIlq5RQuZrtmV+3PGgo8ceijOYMmkbI9D/PrHQSVikAtVVCiYtBZdPliL6pQ5Zpt12vX7Cr+ RFWgw4PSYoa0qbNkUKNNawaltN2eMzPmaXGckG6GJEqtpzYGRGAPTQBysMB6oAgXdBnBO7haCLg8 DGfZp29oEzgG87qMYQvy3I2lBVMKxP6/oUJ4zSZLvsH64CNc0YKm/xh+6mtaMA2UX4yD5n4ee+aw wuECE+DZ8TzHc29Dnrlcznh2pOwExP0CA11aCfgMxN9huyL5ZFxyP93b8VKAox250V99fhNzUH45 CpqrZRDPDi1jgVNwKX5xG0ESc9WG2c0Py9jCDvjw5t5gjjAMO79P0PkLOrBbBPKwwKW+IlieSe4V sI6HJz2O4AcUY1dbqYdp/jZytxU44Z7/E8pN9VvmU54+un936ZDUg3GeIigNqVwq3S3dR2CP0q1R OcZfLc6q5L4FFpPMy0EBcrxX4EEoRoHmTcMOX4uD97AORR5s/uckDs6LuqjRHm5ZUzn8A5DmryJ3 SzVVd88BkbUoj2331FwFTBZgBiy0J3kG48AvvAfGRqBvEAgAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Various's _Auteur Labels Factory Records 1987_: "Quando Quango - Bad Blood" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5aFrOZ8rZII5EkQbWX9Z/EZIUhk= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73410 Archived-At: Olivier Sirven writes: > After some tests, I found that nnimap-split-methods was not > used. `gnus-summary-respool-trace' allowed me to trace what variable was > used to decide the splitting. And it seems it's > nnmail-split-fancy: destination group change when I update this > variable. I don't think `gnus-summary-respool-trace' uses the nnimap-specific splitting variables... > What's weird is that nnmail-split-fancy should be used if and only if > nnmail-split-method is defined to nnmail-split-fancy. Which is not the > case: to make sure I defined it to the same value as > nnimap-split-methods. > > Maybe there is a bug somewhere. What file should I look into if I want > to investigate? Your nnimap split methods looks OK to me, but since they're not being triggered, I'd try edebugging though `nnimap-split-incoming-mail' to see what's going on. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen