From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71087 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: tls-program Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:39 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87y6ay3c1q.fsf@news.realpath.org> <87sk163b6o.fsf@news.realpath.org> <87vd62pdn8.fsf@rimspace.net> <871v8pq374.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284902889 14917 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 13:28:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:28:09 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19460@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 19 15:28:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxJw8-0000V1-02 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:28:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OxJw2-00085C-12; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OxJw0-00084z-No for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxJvw-0007BT-B4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OxJvv-0001sO-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:55 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxJvq-0000Nt-4U for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:50 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:50 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:27:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX98OOfdle2j2r12sIA AAIDAwd4RT7ct6AvOnz6AAACW0lEQVQ4jW2UsW7jMAyGhdPgmWpiz1KKalXNQS8Q9wki7w4SdY2l O/D1j5TjoDicRn4mf/InEwXP5wxiAQtwO7endtDnb4Wl/AP4w3ufTxiLaWDagKe4Qs6w+KqLZTBt wMTe2D7lBeCNqwlIDQwjf25TmhfwFeldMi4CarQly7vCUCr+bhIMDFa0+SMf81xgA+ezZNRa4zFD Xub74vxJQEqXpDx6csfZgrf5ak2pfxjcU1KRqJjj3F+DjtK6Fw1OUTyU6+/z4oPCDybUSjHQxbm+ T9e6gf4F4uqcXbJHDMjO9MMGkiInb60x1pFB/pZ2BbS4p9qVUAQse4ZphKpSSkrlfHiCFrcDBaW0 aCzvPzMsECrsZF9weGpspWzF0Ik4GM6YBfC2mwiO4ACKpR1Y40sDSCsYcgK+BBRHYBxUCqxtHsUf ZFEyIBVrjKlsJlcKXdlBDOyi8VxqXbjp6Bh8CagYqyunGNhNGcbtGRWRna+kNLHBSnUyuYCHxsBC UTzhpyODLBusKiitq0aUeCR7OE+52R64AGpWEhLiettNrKgFEYqClkuc5s3dU+RvJaw5/pDbbRrF FpLOWEkKPqRUyxjBEhGLKx000uOlwft84ymkURb7NXzuGcR+IHK0tTue1l38rTgrVmxvxPU2pVbK cy3a42qll8bAWzq9yKczt0kWdVEDEPhRE/JCdF1h2YHjVa9dVF1gC4qAdu1JrQwK8iQhUKh2gV18 ldPfuwp8D7d0uUspuSV6vLrif4b0PJ+fGQwyi28nKr8vfMa17fM+B/wE2MD0HwACWld/AUTB+49c Kn4aAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Jane Siberry's _Maria_: "Mary Had..." User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OFCyXxEDKe2gb8YEKSBPqoZ87iY= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71087 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: > So they are the typical case for someone with a private dovecot imap > server, running on a debian box somewhere. Yes, that's what I would have imagined. And adding --insecure to the gnutls-cli entries doesn't really change the behaviour for most people. tsl.el (at present) falls back on using openssl, which is insecure by default, so the only effect for people would be that tls.el would be faster. (The only ones who would see an actual switch from secure to insecure would be those that don't have openssl installed at all.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen