Re: Content-type: text/plain

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> Exactly what happens in Outlook when a part doesn't have a
> Content-Type header?
>
> Is there a suitable variable for these kind of workarounds?  E.g.,
> (add-to-list 'mml-workarounds 'always-add-content-type).  IMHO, it
> should be customizable regardless of what the default is.

Since people don't seem to be complaining much, I vote for pretending
that we don't know that there's any problem in this area.

Missing Content-type?  What missing Content-type?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen