From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52817 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: possible bug: article marks are wrong when moving article Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 07:01:32 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nhe7lsfvu.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053773770 5644 80.91.224.249 (24 May 2003 10:56:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 10:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1361@lists.math.uh.edu Sat May 24 12:56:08 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19JWh6-0001So-00 for ; Sat, 24 May 2003 12:56:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19JWir-0003Hn-00; Sat, 24 May 2003 05:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19JWij-0003Hh-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 24 May 2003 05:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 34529 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 10:57:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 34524 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 10:57:48 -0000 Original-Received: from ns2.beld.net (24.233.95.12) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 10:57:48 -0000 Original-Received: by ns2.beld.net (Postfix, from userid 102) id AE7843BE7C; Sat, 24 May 2003 06:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (dhcp-0-9-5b-4d-5-59.cpe.beld.net [24.233.82.84]) by ns2.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7CF3BDA4 for ; Sat, 24 May 2003 06:57:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Ding Mailing List X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Ding Mailing List In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Fri, 23 May 2003 23:19:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52817 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52817 On Fri, 23 May 2003, jas@extundo.com wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> Simple to replicate, only tested under nnimap but might be >> backend-independendent: >> >> pick a previously ticked article >> >> unmark it (M-u) >> >> move it to another group >> >> The article just moved is still ticked. >> >> Can anyone verify that this is a bug and not something caused by my >> configuration? > > I didn't reproduce it, but it is most likely a bug. The reason is > that Gnus only propagate marks in the summary buffer to the server > when you quit the summary buffer. If you unmark something and then > move it, the move command will use the old flags. The solution > would be to make the move command change the flags, alas I don't > have a specific patch in mind. So the temporary solution is to quit the summary, go back and then move? Is the "update marks on server" command a stand-alone function that the article move/copy operation can trigger? If you could point me to where it happens, maybe I can do the rest. Thanks Ted