From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45035
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Make gnus-agent default to t?
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 17:57:59 -0400
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m38z628vlu.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
References: <iluk7psxrif.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<vafbsb4ta2s.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<iluvg9coxeo.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<iluu1orxfnq.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <87r8ju92il.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<iluk7pm39in.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022709494 4465 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 21:58:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17DBSP-00019u-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Wed, 29 May 2002 23:58:14 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17DBSj-0006q6-00; Wed, 29 May 2002 16:58:33 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 29 May 2002 16:58:49 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19103
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 29 May 2002 16:58:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 21931 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 21:58:18 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21926 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 21:58:18 -0000
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (@129.22.96.25)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 May 2002 21:58:18 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 14940 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2002 21:58:22 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <iluk7pm39in.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
 message of "Wed, 29 May 2002 23:54:24 +0200")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45035
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45035

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> wrote:
> (Shouldn't the To/CC of this mail contain both Kai and ding on the To:
> line?  Why did it put Kai on the To: and ding on Cc?)

The recipient list (as determined by Florian's MFT) contains Kai and
ding, in that order.  message-get-reply-headers puts the first
recipient in To and the rest in Cc.


paul