From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39469 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Generating Mail-Followup-To: headers Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:19:08 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87y9m9fs6b.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87elo1exsd.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87u1wvkaiv.fsf@mclinux.com> <87g08fhcmb.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175168 28020 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:39:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 8318 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2001 16:20:24 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2001 16:20:24 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15ucN0-0006jL-00; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:19:38 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:19:16 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA14186 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:19:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 8296 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2001 16:19:08 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8291 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2001 16:19:08 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (qmail-remote@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2001 16:19:08 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22430 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2001 16:19:30 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87g08fhcmb.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> (Matt Armstrong's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:29:32 -0600") Original-Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39469 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39469 Matt Armstrong wrote: > Instead of gnus-use-mft, it should be 'subscribed' or > 'is-subscribed'. Then the description for the parameter can be > something like: > > If subscribed set to t, then the to-address parameter in this > group is considered to "subscribed" (i.e. mail sent to these > addresses gets to you). If to-address is unset, then to-list is > consulted. to-list should be consulted in any case. There's no reason we can't use both. > Can we ignore the to-list parameter? If set, it should always be > equal to to-address, right? to-address is not always set. to-address is a wrong-side kluge that attempts to solve the problem that MFT really does solve. I always use to-list, and never to-address. As MFT becomes more widely supported, to-address will become less useful. >> So, what would be the best way to use this flag? > > This flag replaces your original idea of using a regexp to specify the > list of groups which contain "subscribed" addresses. Now, we go > through all the groups and ignore those that don't have the > 'subscribed' parameter set. Sounds good to me. paul