From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37751
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@scientist.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MML menu in message-mode is poorly named
Date: 13 Aug 2001 15:18:07 +0200
Organization: Gnus Information Center
Message-ID: <m38zgojdyo.fsf@neo.loria>
References: <vaf1ymtumem.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <rjsnf00y02.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> <ilur8ui6y3v.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> <m3ae16890o.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu> <E15VqR9-0000g3-00@dahaIM.dyndns.org> <vaflmkpussa.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87vgjs7p6x.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> <vaf7kw8cj75.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173111 15467 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:05:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:05:11 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <news@quimby.gnus.org>
Return-Path: <news@quimby.gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 24932 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 13:57:08 -0000
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 13:57:08 -0000
Original-Received: (from news@localhost)
	by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00040
	for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:56:55 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: lucas.loria!nobody
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn-213-36-106-71.ppp.libertysurf.fr
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 997711014 22093 213.36.106.71 (13 Aug 2001 13:56:54 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Aug 2001 13:56:54 GMT
X-PGP-KeyID: 0xF22A794E
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5854 AF2B 65B2 0E96 2161  E32B 285B D7A1 F22A 794E
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)
Original-Lines: 10
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37751
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37751

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du lundi 13 août 2001, vers
13:06, Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> disait:

> Okay.  So if the MML menu was split into two menus, we'd know that the
> two menus should be named "Security" and "Attachments".

> Should the MML menu be split into two?

My menubar is almost full, I think it is the case of many other
persons. :)