From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23602 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: p0.88 misparses 2nd-level message forwarding Date: 28 Jun 1999 19:32:08 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <2naetrafil.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161304 2902 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:48:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13991 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:42:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB24980; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:38:35 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:39:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19265 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:38:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13807 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:37:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA32180; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:46:20 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Joanna Russ' _What Are We Fighting For?_ X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Turbulent Indigo_: "Turbulent Indigo" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "22 Jun 1999 21:28:47 -0400" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070089 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.89) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Interesting point. So the conclusion is simply to number them > sequentially? That's what seems to make the most sense in an Emacs context. > That works fine for me, but I thought we were up against some sort > of MIME RFC requirement to force a hierarchical view somehow. I don't think the RFCs say anything about that... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen