From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18920 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `b' Date: 19 Nov 1998 07:00:00 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157362 8800 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:42:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03488 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 01:12:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAB08008; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:12:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:12:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA19591 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:11:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp072.uio.no [129.240.240.77]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03440 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 01:11:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA08923; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 07:17:43 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Elizabeth Hand's _Waking the Moon_ X-Now-Playing: Cabaret Voltaire's _The Crackdown_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "18 Nov 1998 19:43:07 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070052 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.52) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I think, I may be biased (:-), that `C-d' does its job well, and even, that > the code is not so badly written. Maybe it could do better now using `mm-*' > stuff? Such `mm-*' did not exist at the time `C-d' became able to split > MIME parts, and `C-d' has most probably not been reevaluated since then. > You say that using `mm-*' will give us `uuencoded' parts? Anything else? I don't think so. I think the `C-d' on MIME multiparts works very well, and I don't think it is productive to make the nndoc interface more un-Gnusey. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen