From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16711 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.15 is released Date: 05 Sep 1998 17:45:41 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155539 29444 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04506 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 11:45:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAF15032; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 10:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 05 Sep 1998 10:45:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA09599 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 10:44:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp074.uio.no [129.240.240.79]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04485 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 11:44:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA21875; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 17:47:48 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Walt Whitman's _Leaves of Grass_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jean-Yves Perrier's message of "05 Sep 1998 10:41:58 +0200" X-Mailer: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.16/XEmacs 21.0 - "Finnish Landrace" X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > the output has a lot more \201 than Gnus 0.14 :-( Ick. > First thing I notice is, when I send a message with יאיאאי > in the subject, these are sent as 8 bits. (and then displayed as > \201י... in my *Summary buffer*) > > Shouldn't they be sent using ?iso-8859-1?Q?... syntax? Not necessarily. It depends on `rfc2047-default-charset'. Anyway, if they are sent without \201's, but displayed as such, then that would seem to indicate that they are being decoded twice. Or something... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen