From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5777 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Neumann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nndb mailing list? Date: 28 Mar 1996 23:56:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1l3f6tro45.fsf@zagato.visix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146332 1371 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:38:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA00952 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:32:56 -0800 Original-Received: from smart.ruhr.de (smart.ruhr.de [193.100.176.36]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 23:55:57 +0100 Original-Received: (from tom@localhost) by smart.ruhr.de (8.7.1/8.7.1) id XAA21370; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 23:56:07 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Joe Hildebrand's message of 28 Mar 1996 15:14:05 -0700 Original-Lines: 14 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.60/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5777 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5777 Joe Hildebrand writes: > [...] It includes filtering rules ala procmail > (although they don't always work right), [...] One can of course always use procmail to do the actual rule based mail dispatching and have procmail pipe the message to nndel. That's what I'm doing right now, and so far I'm very satisfied, having both the power of the full procmail rule system and nndb's speedy message access is a nice solution. I think it's time to thank the authors for developing nndb. Nice job so far. -t