From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77944 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: A Cleaner Build Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:05:39 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <871v25vaxx.fsf@randomsample.de> <87wrjxtqjp.fsf@randomsample.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300395969 15707 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2011 21:06:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:06:09 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26261@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Mar 17 22:06:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOS-0001f5-VY for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:06:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOP-0004r4-Mq; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOO-0004ql-58 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOJ-0006l7-Qu for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOJ-0003bM-3n for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:05:55 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0KOG-0001Zs-Aq for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:05:52 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:05:52 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:05:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAADFBMVEVqbHf+/v7+//7Ly85z LjD3AAACU0lEQVQokU2QUUgTcRzHf3lwUelukATNwB7Ch71kpohL3WRlEIK9nMEhOSiRnZYTaoEQ LAY9prG2CIxduHn3//3PusPX0iPRB8FlpELHMh8i3Cl4oTZaip1v/R6+8H34wuf3AdvPHXL7zD5j gw1yOCt0vWKVzyqogJjpm0chU6EyKpjp/M05C1UPdalQE7vxvZvVqYWCBBMzvnx5rnMyh+gUJzhW 11qpJUF8AlUWMRHNeCXo5FepiYimLErQVl8rYilFfEebbEvAuyLoKXHCKQndOHNPSE1n9cp12CGX g9iE77Z6qs/DoLh3VEar8sUQDFh80hDpaFXLsAYFMneL86D8yGiIwUN+12+cdQm7dp0G1/j0bGSj rOcUVATgJTfAsQqTOGdw61DJ9P46oEyi0WYlyEP4cTWiOpT3SRCBXt7hIl8aHJxKJsyLT5HCYVMI CntiG00hMXbKa0FXfMGva6j4uW8RuEQ9DzztH+hi/aAN151xwezEZ5m+JWiS4ya9OIWx6LQGZLkD sTuCsVxKg7AvSMzjk/h6mLihYCY/nSyiYv3JusGRzPh0U7HK74/CnYVNBtML09gtGjC+QBaRtow8 R9kN8kqyHZXT8RFEA95KSwFLqcGpI6Nvxt2RC72iw+G4FjO/tW3LMX/XI8HactnY1ibm6HZJgqG/ uYyXkLqrP5y3fx4gFUqkdVgWQ0D8OPXEhfO02QpBY7O344DF9vfFSQkqGDOwKiDOlGLr4OIxPUsL pP92zA2HpVJ0l25sXOnSauFFzv4YR9p/4tjYEvx//wD/gy8YN211kwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Emeralds's _Headboggle_: "Lococlayco" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1NYeNyLL6rLHJai70CpY1e9jZo4= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77944 Archived-At: David Engster writes: > Yes, I figured that from /home/larsi (unless you hacked the buildbot, > that is). :-) locate-user-emacs-file existed in FSF Emacs 21. I have no > idea where that's coming from. But I'm guessing it's some quirk in your > installation. Yup. Hm... > Yeah well. That's what I thought. I fixed that now. Great! > The last warning I see is from Emacs22: > > In toplevel form: > message.el:1923:20:Warning: `make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at > toplevel > > Otherwise it looks nice&clean, at least for the warnings enabled in > dgnushack (the buildbot does a normal 'make', not 'make warn'). Right. I'll switch on the "fail on warnings" thing in dgnushack. Or should we have a special build target for that? Like "make warn"? I guess so. I've now added a "warn" target in the makefile, but it just does the same as "all" for now. But feel free to switch the target to "make warn" on the buildbot, and I'll make the "warn" target do the right thing later. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen