From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70735 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:20:04 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87hbi3jasy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284225680 29671 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2010 17:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:21:20 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19108@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Sep 11 19:21:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTlH-0001sk-Uy for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:21:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTkS-0001De-7n; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTkP-0001DN-BC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTkK-0006ra-0h for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OuTkJ-0004F2-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:20:11 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTkI-00019g-T0 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:20:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEULCQoJBgcMCwyTaGUR DhAKCAkGBAUrGxsvI9GiAAACQElEQVQ4jXWUzW/bMAzFWaNaryVQp1dV8NDrBh10TVwDvsoZiF7X w3KOKxv69/co5WNtMSJGAP78HilSCeWcPCKXWIZL0FhAzp8J5Yx8SOHj+wqKU9EMXwGe8D9QFX3n ar6/WI2lhGt6150U/lwDwFnrHEj/GVhrm6ZxHegFjFVBjXP4XEGoJRw1tuTPIK2lWeSpauwJBLNU YAsgVWi7L/6oTfaaVi9bQVhs2hLIlko06ApWKWydvSVxbrAlTefiR1FnsSRVcAbZCJm7VYSiaQVh 9CCwWlq8WRIsLKrC4dFGnltuyIrEOIkBloiZ9LDaMZMhmUSm1hQl2tKxM7Mx0nLbMksJSHS6M7PW ZJn+BT0lP3NeAPiqoAaK5N8ffVAwjeDthGKyxxC87159vkEleQkEOwZphu/kQwPFrDbPeWumosCw oLCvPmxxMrnNx1PxrtfiOWTrjRgT0w89DorrrEZsNSW/SjRTWoqCaO96us8eK0krR6IK9g4XpSe+ H3W3c4thpcVGzLpcLWL+nX0Ydiwm6kHEYOhdAfyAH8+qY3kuVk1VSCsP3ZiObRS5W+p0LfYPwC8r pRkHnF6PqtP7gyHC6tdPTk/45scjBh116QW02BXdbBS86wZOCoytjI6vAMW1BnOjs33DM84TS9yX HxXApp14c4DVIa9vLHs9hwKQzaHGuNNl7NVpgP+GFbwpeIKhrlxrTFN9+xse2oD/EantnnzOqgNE MOvp7H8NtKyKL/kDDo87+hGg2+iG8hfwF4zpDgJmKbXaAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Split's _Xiu Xiu, Parenthetical Girls_: "Xiu Xiu - I am Hated for Loving" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4mkj3F+AKgkpzvW8uJnnR+fExvA= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70735 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Next I'll do group entry and article selection, and then it's time to > implement the new group info function that will return real ranges of > unread/read/unseen articles directly to Gnus without going via the > *nntpd* buffer. It might be called... er... > `nnimap-request-group-data'? Eurhm. I'm reading the RFC, and I'm wondering whether I'm seriously missing something. Is the client supposed to do a EXAMINE foo FETCH 1:* (FLAGS) on each single mailbox to get all the article data? If you have a million emails on the server (and who hasn't?), that'll like take forever. Fer sure. What? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen