From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53733 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus: UTF-8 and compatibility with other MUAs Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:01:34 +0200 Organization: http://purl.org/harder/ Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061039175 20456 80.91.224.253 (16 Aug 2003 13:06:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2277@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Aug 16 15:06:13 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19o0l3-0000I9-00 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:06:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19o0jb-00047d-00; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 08:04:43 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19o0jU-00047X-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 08:04:36 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 54318 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2003 13:04:36 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 54313 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 13:04:35 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 13:04:35 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19o0kv-0002iL-00 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:06:05 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: localhost.localdomain!nobody Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 18 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 0xc3f95330.esnxr2.ras.tele.dk Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1061039165 10436 195.249.83.48 (16 Aug 2003 13:06:05 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Aug 2003 13:06:05 GMT X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r; writes: > If you are satisfied with a _fair_ chance to be flawlessly readable > at the other end, you may use UTF-8. But the purpose of email is to _communicate_. Why lower you chance of cummunicating if there is no compelling technical reason to do so? > How long it will take for Unicode to become as widespread in western > Europe as Latin-1 is now -- I don't know. But so far it has spread > very rapidly. 1. Application support isn't that great. Emacs, (La)TeX and Texinfo don't support Unicode fully (those are some of the most important applications as far as I'm concerned). 2. Unicode support itself doesn't really buy me a lot if most people don't have fairly complete Unicode fonts (which they don't).