From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29286 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jussi Yli-Urpo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Small complaint about M-g Date: 22 Feb 2000 22:54:45 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165981 1854 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:06:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA043D051E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:57:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB14011; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:57:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:55:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06830 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:55:18 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from h32.erkki.ton.tut.fi (h32.erkki.ton.tut.fi [193.166.84.85]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9D3D051E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:54:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from jmy@localhost) by h32.erkki.ton.tut.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA00253; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:54:48 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: h32.erkki.ton.tut.fi: jmy set sender to jmy@tavis.ton.tut.fi using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Harry Putnam's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 00:04:08 GMT" Original-Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29286 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29286 Harry Putnam writes: > When inside a group and wanting to rescan from source with `M-g', `ESC > g' `Z G' is it really necessary to loose all trace of what you were > doing, have the group completely reshuffled and any open but read > messages buried. This was one of the reasons I eventually turned off marking selected articles automatically as read. Now in all my mail groups I either manually mark them read one by one or catchup whole group when I'm sure that I haven't missed anything important. This way I can safely rescan group (or do something else in some other buffer) as often I wan't and I can still see all those mails that I haven't read yet (of course ticking those would also work but it just too easy to forget to do). > Can't we bring in new messages without all that? I have see this same question asked before. Conclusion must have been that it's not easy to implement. > Lots of times I just want to bring in a message in a certain thread and > hold my place there. Clearing mark of the current message before rescan would also help to keep at least your current message there. Could you do same thing for whole thread? -- Jussi.