From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24362 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Stevenson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: bug in date washing Date: 18 Jul 1999 15:38:12 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161941 8281 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA27522 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB02827; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 14:36:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 18 Jul 1999 14:37:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11655 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 14:37:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov (paul@q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov [134.167.20.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA27449 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from paul@localhost) by q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA06076; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:38:13 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24362 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24362 In article mode 'W T i' turns the date line into iso8601 format. Trying to rewash the date into any other format then barfs. My lisp skills are insufficient to provide a fix, but I have traced the problem to the fact that article-date-ut uses the washed date line from the header as input and passes this straight on to article-make-date-line which itself calls date-to-time which calls parse-time-string which does not understand iso8601 format. So either article-date-ut could get the 'unwashed' date and pass it on, or parse-time-string could be persuaded to speak iso8601. Paul