From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11429 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Default mail address Date: 21 Jun 1997 02:01:49 -0700 Sender: eagle@windlord.Stanford.EDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151137 30183 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:58:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA16045 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 03:53:17 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA28260 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 03:53:55 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA18334 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 05:53:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 11:01:54 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 30674 invoked by uid 504); 21 Jun 1997 09:01:53 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 30671 invoked from network); 21 Jun 1997 09:01:53 -0000 Original-Received: from windlord.Stanford.EDU (36.21.0.44) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 1997 09:01:52 -0000 Original-Received: (from eagle@localhost) by windlord.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA27184; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 02:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 21 Jun 1997 04:00:44 +0200 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 17 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1819 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11429 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11429 Hrvoje Niksic writes: > Alan Shutko writes: >> This gives me a good reason to change the Sender header. > Report it as a bug. > I've never received mails on my `Sender' address. I receive mail at my Sender address *constantly*, often including autoreplies. But that doesn't change the point, which I agree with; that's broken behavior, specifically incorrect according to RFC 822, and should be reported as a bug. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)