From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73678 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:27:13 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87bp6i5e57.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288392017 26350 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2010 22:40:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22047=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Oct 30 00:40:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxcL-0005yi-4C for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxcK-0000W8-Ee for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxcJ-0000W3-6b for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxcE-0002Ym-IM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PBxcD-0005Lo-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxcC-0005uk-2W for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:04 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:04 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEWAnsZsjrv++d1zk77d 2MlIZIZpirMICwtjg6kgOFaREkMdAAACN0lEQVQ4jXXUT2/aMBQA8MeAqrvViopyRBmTeiTzQD0i lqrtbWz16tyWsVj5BlluRW0i79itNPjb7j2H/BnrLIWAf9jPL3k26P80qG5JdStUFwplW4G/IsaV agA7WYQf+IU5nPsjogLwZ8QYG41oFGOcc2MbFLafWlQBK1NqkMg4z2O5irUrZa5PtQ4rmOOEMt5s TjeukDp3Z+4elHajhHEMN0oKde5u3P1UvG4+huFTAEhfAuyH47KC6R5YDYufFczMI17PfgNAkNWw a2EQduHZJ6HYMBRlPVUfwcawIESZEfjM6eO/uxD+SA0uN2ibjZ2L2ywbIiy9pi0ItLg16WvM4xBw BIbA4OLGO8OrhmkuTJqWCNsn7615auBEC1NS8Jk5hBBXu4X1LPwbnCQ0GWU+Hyy9CbxqYH0chpg6 rA+XewLUn/2bxzqnR7WD9WEejhAmNF8wePHdG/N3bR4AfXxvCAfLBQJ4GTiBqmE8CCCWd0cFlsP8 HuH8/r33Rn3zrqlitze59M6M/oxQL/cytRA8jIXQv7tQ4iqNxCIxuyGBs4fr1Aidi6ssF+LikYFK 8DlNgqV3IeQdBLCQEG7FygEV21X9ssG34uNEBFqEOKKoAXPoa/0VM9eFXqkWqEp6VEMObryIQD7g O//kLYIBgkN7LtEbBBW0j7fHeZ/7iErhru3Ah2o/4Ja3EHRHEFQHAEIzhsDBeRJ7MtiqRcKa6DlY 3qo+MjpF3WMjppIaBi0c0blRHTJ/AB9bQ8a9tEtAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Simple Minds's _Sister Feelings Call_: "Careful in Career" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:K4j6QwSLqVxYkij52jwtkHVyXDk= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73678 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Maybe the whole IMAP interaction should be designed as an async queue > (with the option to insert at either end) rather than a command-reply > serial stream. I think we really need to wait until the moving has finished, so that we can tell the user whether something failed or not. And stuff. > LMI> (*-request-move-articles-internally articles from-group server to-group) [...] > I am suspicious of such special functions. If there's a way to make > moves faster, shouldn't all backends benefit from it? Any backends where this would make sense could implement the new function. But I don't really think this matters much for anything other than IMAP. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen