Re: Reading HTML messages

[Frank Schmitt <ich@frank-schmitt.net>]

Flatman <flatman@swing.be> writes:

> Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:
>
>> | Render of HTML contents.
>> | It is one of defined renderer types, or a rendering function.
>> | The defined renderer types are:
>> | `w3'   : use Emacs/W3;
>> | `w3m'  : use emacs-w3m;
>> | `w3m-standalone': use w3m;
>> | `links': use links;
>> | `lynx' : use lynx;
>> | `html2text' : use html2text;
>> | nil    : use external viewer.
>
>
> which one is the most used ? Which has the nicest output ? Which has
> the most configuration possibilities ?  which one has the best support
> in the future ?

I think most people like emacs-w3m best. w3 is nice, too but I think
it's development has stopped.

-- 
Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.