From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49968 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ami Fischman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: M-g doesn't check subtopics? Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:05:25 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044756743 32200 80.91.224.249 (9 Feb 2003 02:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 02:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hgxB-0008N5-00 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 03:12:21 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18hgxw-00073w-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 20:13:08 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 08 Feb 2003 20:14:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26136 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:13:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hgvc-0008IT-00 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 03:10:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hgoQ-0007zf-00 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 03:03:18 +0100 Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IKGVtymq4I1XFJfkL1CNZ5n/cO0= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49968 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49968 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > But it might make sense to change this to have these work > recursively. Any opinions? My opinion, in case it wasn't obvious, is that I'd like to see recursive behaviour here :) Cheers, -- Ami Fischman usenet@fischman.org