From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44757 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Rohland Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: agent hosed in oort gnus? Date: 08 May 2002 09:14:35 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020842476 11122 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 07:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 07:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175LlE-0002tH-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 09:21:16 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 175Lix-0001W8-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 02:18:55 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 08 May 2002 02:19:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA11102 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 02:18:58 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 14980 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 07:18:36 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14975 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 07:18:35 -0000 Original-Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de (194.39.131.53) by gnus.org with SMTP; 8 May 2002 07:18:35 -0000 Original-Received: from sap-ag.de (smtpde02) by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (out) with ESMTP id JAA19471; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:19:16 +0200 (MESZ) Original-To: Wes Hardaker Organisation: Development SAP J2EE Engine In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) X-SAP: out X-SAP: out Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44757 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44757 Hi Wes, On Tue, 07 May 2002, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Well, oort now defaults to caching things in the agent cache all the > time now. The problem is that they haven't tied together the normal > expiry process with the agent one. IMHO, they should be bound > together. Originally, if I remember correctly, Lars didn't trust > the agent expiry process at the time (it wasn't mature) so he didn't > want to force binding it. It's time, IMHO, to do so now though. But the respective articles were not delete by expiry but by 'B del'. So there should be no inconsistency... Greetings Christoph