From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36114 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mail-Followup-To not only for wide replies considered harmful Date: 03 May 2001 15:20:15 -0400 Sender: prj@multivac.cwru.edu Message-ID: References: <87lmoexvfv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87vgniut3o.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171753 6831 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:42:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 614 invoked by alias); 3 May 2001 19:21:22 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 609 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 19:21:22 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 May 2001 19:21:22 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1881 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2001 19:20:37 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87vgniut3o.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "03 May 2001 21:31:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36114 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36114 Florian Weimer writes: > "Jason R. Mastaler" writes: > > Another thought about Mail-Followup-To: -- shouldn't the default be to > > honor Mail-Followup-To instead of prompting the user as is the case > > currently? Mail-Copies-To is automatically honored by Gnus. > > The current behavior is analogous to the treatment of the Followup-To > header. In fact, it is controlled by the same variable. Yes, but that was just a kludge. It was "good enough" when I first wrote the MFT stuff, and I just haven't gotten back to it. paul