From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34685 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: burying Gnus buffers Date: 09 Feb 2001 09:32:16 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87hf24jifd.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170565 31632 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:22:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDCFD049D for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:33:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAC07462; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:32:48 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Feb 2001 08:32:09 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA27949 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:32:00 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.96.25]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6927CD049D for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:32:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 1054 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2001 14:32:38 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Arcady Genkin's message of "09 Feb 2001 04:48:38 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34685 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34685 Arcady Genkin writes: > Karl Kleinpaste writes: > > You're working too hard. `z' runs gnus-group-suspend. > > I wish it was also available from the summary buffer, or are there > reasons for not having suspend in the summary view? It would be a bit dangerous. AIUI, it would be equivalent to gnus-summary-exit-no-update followed by z in the group buffer. -no-update is probably not what you want, in which case youe should q out of all your summary buffers first. paul