From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22081 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnmail-split-header-length-limit is EVIL! Date: 28 Mar 1999 17:09:59 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87sobotazh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87u2vxfn00.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87k8whq4kx.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160065 26252 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26599 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:37:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB17559; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:37:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:37:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA05307 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:35:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp088.uio.no [129.240.240.93]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26487 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:35:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA01889; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:35:02 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Anne McCaffrey & Margaret Ball's _Acorna_ X-Now-Playing: Pet Shop Boys's _Before (cd1)_: "Before" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "16 Mar 1999 08:25:02 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070081 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.81) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Because there is no clearly defined "regexp error". At least I recall > you mentioning regexps that take hours to match, or something like > that. Oh, I had forgotten that. Yes, there were two problems with the long lines -- the regexp could either overflow, or it could just take forever to run. I've now reverted to removing the lines again. :-( -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen