From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18918 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.46 is released Date: 19 Nov 1998 06:57:27 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157361 8791 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:42:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03471 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 01:12:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAB08003; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:12:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:12:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA19592 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:11:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp072.uio.no [129.240.240.77]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03439 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 01:11:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA08922; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 07:17:43 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Elizabeth Hand's _Waking the Moon_ X-Now-Playing: Cabaret Voltaire's _The Crackdown_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "18 Nov 1998 16:57:55 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070052 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.52) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > Is it common to send multipart messages that only contain a single part? > > Not really common, yet I remember having (softly :-) complained to a few > of my correspondents who were always doing that. Yup. Anyway, perhaps we should just drop the buttons for all the text/plain parts totally? It's not like anyone wants to toggle those parts... although I guess people might want to save them separately and stuff. Hm. > > I haven't seen any Q encodings of headers in eons. Could you give us > > an example? > > Do you mean RFC1522 (now RFC2070, if not mistaken)? > > Even if ugly, these address a real need. Of course, you'll more likely > see B for messages showing Asian names, but for Latin languages sharing > many letters with the English alphabet, Q is still likely to occur. Yes, but I meant that I haven't seen them, since Gnus decodes them automatically now. :-) (Both Q and B encodings.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen