From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16456 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.9 is released Date: 30 Aug 1998 19:34:04 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d89is9i4.fsf@duckman.mork.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155325 27882 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:08:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA24784 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 13:43:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAF18767; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:40:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA20309 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:40:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp030.uio.no [129.240.240.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA24750 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 13:40:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA16103; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 19:42:27 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Charles Reznikoff's _Poems 1918-1975_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: "Bjørn Mork"'s message of "Sun, 30 Aug 1998 16:46:27 GMT" X-Mailer: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.10/XEmacs 21.0 - "Finnish Landrace" X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > Hm... Perhaps I should have read RFC1522 before starting. Nah. > > wouldn't reading RFC2045-49 be better? Perhaps, but from what I can see in the appendix of RFC2049, the changes in the area covered by RFC1522 are slight, indeed. In fact, the appendix gives the impression that they've mostly fixed typos, added examples and tightened the BNF. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen