From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53840 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-url-mailto broken on foo+bar@somewhere.invalid Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:42:28 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061984627 29865 80.91.224.253 (27 Aug 2003 11:43:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2380@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 27 13:43:46 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ryiH-0007na-00 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:43:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19ryhh-0006K1-00; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 06:43:09 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19ryhZ-0006Jt-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 06:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 62990 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2003 11:43:01 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 62985 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2003 11:43:01 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO mail.epost.de) (193.28.100.187) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2003 11:43:01 -0000 Original-Received: from seneca.benny.turtle-trading.net.epost.de (193.99.153.30) by mail.epost.de (6.7.015) id 3F45196D0007B3FD; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:42:55 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Jesper Harder's message of "Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:37:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53840 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53840 Hi Jesper, Jesper Harder writes: > I'm wondering if the "+" -> " " substitution is bogus not just for > mailto: but for all URI types. I can't find anything in RFC 2396 > stating that this substitution should be performed. > > I guess that code should just be removed from > `gnus-url-unhex-string'. It is in the HTML spec, see and in RFC 1630 (which is only informational). Both indicate that the "+" substitution only applies to the query part of an http:// URL. benny