From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50292 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ami Fischman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: A T more intelligent than ^ ? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:45:28 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045953978 28815 80.91.224.249 (22 Feb 2003 22:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 22:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18miPQ-0007Uc-00 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:46:17 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18miOw-0004lJ-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:45:46 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:46:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00720 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:46:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18miOX-0007Sh-00 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:45:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18miOW-0007SX-00 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:45:20 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8VIPlABfoZwPhpZqlB/GvgpfNsE= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50292 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50292 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Then that's not due to `A T' being better at threading than `^', but > just because `A T' fetches a gazillion headers and then gathers based > on Subject. Okay, then, can ^ be modified to fetch the gazillion headers, gather on subject, and then give the preceding article in the resulting tree? Or do you prefer to keep the distinction between the underlying behaviour and prefer that people hit the A T if ^ gets them nothing? -- Ami Fischman usenet@fischman.org