From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49047 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Getting started with spam filtering Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:39:50 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <84u1gkfa84.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <4n65szll2k.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87fzs3p628.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87r8bmjhhl.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87u1ghi4ot.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042216675 25877 80.91.224.249 (10 Jan 2003 16:37:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18X29W-0006gP-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:37:02 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18X2A3-0000l2-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:37:35 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:38:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA22354 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:38:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 57043 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2003 16:37:14 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 57038 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 16:37:14 -0000 Original-Received: from ns1.beld.net (208.229.215.81) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 16:37:14 -0000 Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (dhcp-0-30-bd-1-93-b2.cpe.beld.net [24.233.65.6]) by ns1.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CDE3B892; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:37:11 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Niklas Morberg X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Niklas Morberg , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Niklas Morberg's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:43:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49047 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49047 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, niklas.morberg@axis.com wrote: > Couldn't `S t' be bound to a wrapper function (`spam-score' > or something) that calls the appropriate spam processor's > score mechanism? It's not a bad idea, I like it but I'm concerned for the novice user. There's several spam scores that could be active at once: - ifile - bogofilter - blacklist - spam-stat And then there's the ham scores (BBDB, whitelist, plus ifile/bogofilter/spam-stat that unify spam and ham scores). I guess spam.el could have an abstract spam score, but that gets complicated because we have to correlate the spam scores of all the spam splitters that are enabled. Any ideas? Ted