From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48068 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnmaildir's article counts are better now Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 12:41:29 -0500 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039196630 26977 80.91.224.249 (6 Dec 2002 17:43:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18KMVw-00070u-00 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 18:43:48 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18KMUD-0005W4-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:42:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA22690 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:42:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 16975 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 17:41:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16970 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2002 17:41:30 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2002 17:41:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4322 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2002 17:41:51 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48068 I think I finally found the problem with nnmaildir's article counts in the *Group* buffer. So now it should be no worse than the other mail backends. (You'll still have overestimates for groups with holes in the article ranges.) paul