Re: new spam.el

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, yamaoka@jpl.org wrote:
> It is said by the macro `bbdb-search' which requires that the
> 4th argument is a string or a symbol.  So, I think the function
> `spam-check-bbdb' can be modified as follows:
> 
> (defun spam-check-bbdb ()
>   "We want people, who are in bbdb not to be splitted to spam"
>   (let ((who (message-fetch-field "from")))
>     (when who
>       (setq who (regexp-quote (cadr (gnus-extract-address-components who)))) 
>       (bbdb-search (bbdb-records) nil nil who))))

I added the change, with one more modification (we want to return the
value of spam-split-group, it's not t or nil).  Thank you.

I also fixed spam-check-whitelist, which also returned t or nil and
should return spam-split-group or nil.

I'm doing this to be consistent with Francois' code, which let each
checking function return a string (spam-split-group) or nil, rather
than have the spam-split function aggregate all the return values of t
or nil.

Ted