From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38128 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Rendering on Bm Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:32:18 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173757 19189 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:15:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20686 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 19:33:05 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 19:33:05 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA20704 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 998335983 7001 195.204.10.148 (20 Aug 2001 19:33:03 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 2001 19:33:03 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Bronski Beat's _The Age Of Consent_: "Screaming" User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Considering that the entire `B' keymap consists of actions involving > shuffling things around in the backend (i.e. the filesystem) rather > than the frontend (i.e. my eyeballs)...well, while it may currently > constitute a special case, I don't see any explanation for (what I > perceive as) the failure mode of process-marking 150 messages followed > by `B m' followed by Gnus choking by observing for my "benefit" the > lack of a known PGP key for the signed content therein. I'm moving > the articles Elsewhere -- why should I care about _anything_ having to do > with rendering, least of all the complicated nightmare of invoking PGP? Well, you've convinced me. Should I make all the moving/copying/re-spooling functions completely non-selecting? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen