From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18178 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: new NOV stuff in p0.40 Date: 26 Oct 1998 03:48:55 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156748 4811 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:32:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA09667 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 21:51:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB27614; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:51:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:50:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA14494 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:50:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp100.uio.no [129.240.240.105]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA09638 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 21:50:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA01528; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 03:50:25 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: C. J. Cherry's _Finity's End_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "25 Oct 1998 20:40:17 -500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070041 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.41) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I believe I favor the 2nd suggested form, using sublists under "extra". > > Since you consider this easy :-), I believe I'll wait a day or three > to see if you come up with something; if not, I'll see if I can get my > elisp karma worked up to produce something sensible. I think I'll leave it to you. :-) (I think the right approach would be to add a gnus-score-extra method to `gnus-header-index', and write a new scoring function; perhaps based on gnus-score-string.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen