From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15800 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Make Category Score match on Re: Date: 01 Aug 1998 11:39:48 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154774 24119 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11115 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 11:47:39 -0700 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA23117 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 14:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAS22977; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 13:14:12 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 01 Aug 1998 13:42:35 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA17145 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 13:42:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from beach.silcom.com (beach.silcom.com [199.201.128.19]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA20992 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 14:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost (pm6-21.sba1.avtel.net [207.71.222.71]) by beach.silcom.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA09669 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "01 Aug 1998 16:36:53 +0200" Original-Lines: 45 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.27/Emacs 20.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15800 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15800 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Harry Putnam writes: > > > Does the scoring mechanism for category scoring ignore the "Re:" in > > subject lines? > > I've looked over the code, and I couldn't see anything like that... Probably more home grown bungling on my part. > unless you have `gnus-score-thread-simplify' set. gnus-score-thread-simplify's value is nil The only other thread related thing I have set (I think) is (setq gnus-thread-hide-subtree t) Checking some more this morning I see 3 of 4 groups assigned to the 'Re:' category are working like I wanted so apparently I have something misconfigured for the one group. 'G-p' shows 'nil'. The groups where I want to screen only the replies are assigned to a category like so: Category 'Re:' high Score: (("subject" ("Re: " nil nil r))) Groups: ("comp.protocols.ppp" "alt.unix.wizards" "comp.editors" "comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains") alt.unix.wizards is not having replies screened for some reason. The '@' mark is still being attached to postings with 'Re:' in the subject and so they are not being downloaded. The other three are working fine. How can I trace what is happening with alt.unix.wizards? I hoped for a simple spelling error or the like but see none. -- Harry Putnam reader@newsguy.com