From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74510 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: deleting articles from search groups? Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:28:12 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87eia5p2qn.fsf@andy.bu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291005020 29414 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2010 04:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:30:20 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22869@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 29 05:30:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMvNX-0006Ki-LW for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:30:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PMvNT-0005sG-5H; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:30:11 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PMvNS-0005s6-1D for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:30:10 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PMvNN-0007Qx-MP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:30:09 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PMvNM-0005DM-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:30:04 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMvNM-0006HM-9h for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:30:04 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:30:04 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:30:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEUKBggHBAUbFxsDAQOK h44FAgQBAAGAzOCNAAACUklEQVQ4jWVS0VLkIBAcUN5hV+4ZEe/ZlYJnL8UHBFPjD1Dm/z/heoie rkcqm830dE83gfaSM5dR636skfOouWTKvHHp+bOOlfeacya+gOHyB2MQ7jqB2X057xMYT7HWkg8G n8+D8yzX/bRsg7c950KOiq/l7VAft+3XMaNQ4VJh4KCM1EQUhS4ztvy+H7aGXjJ4sGPIdLSP3eK1 5mGNpMrZefK8MjKlB2hDGlctoytLhlcDSvo9Mw/w9rF7VuRc9+jU5wFBQHA+xoWZVCe3lfUmlzdQ 8pj+Lm4lUmwYcloVV+q7SEGUHRE59vlZt8Zb2XLeZh7k6HfBa9NvW3vIOcYWah1l60zurq3kV53a H+aoA7yHp0iG6LYRWUqtvXCJCAueXjBhPbX71SpINX9azJYetxSXEIl0elhPmN0aoZOhmNpLjBRj fNQUBQippfu0cIroEyBqakmA1lKgxZLwCfcSJ6HNv61J6wHE1L5W0roZjRloP+oiuUh3CC7GhQJs RVwLuhR84k2HpSHiSsaiOT5Pi/C3xIAnGY2QyP7a6eYSHZxCRSH546vik6H1iQu/WhcEwIclCq/E 3tNl7Vz0KhkW2SnZLDoz4yAxznYnCbdEqVvPYKDIvTv5bhJTANdxUJi7dd15ASTKwbDGoE7KTQLB JYkrdHpoTIC+L2izUwfg7DfAsSxw3OS5K0TKUqcrhiWPVucBX81wboqD0e0VoGSyskqi/KvZD8bE /2ccLuURrgA1XeIXB/kHw0q7g6+fWhaeLBp+DBFx9bWH11KfUb+tv4ogs8xdeu4VAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Mark Kozelek's _Lost Verses - Live_: "Tiny Cities" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TYiQOG17vAdlAHYiPdvYDTb57jU= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74510 Archived-At: Andrew Cohen writes: > But after doing this, I'm wondering whether or not this is a good > idea. Should we worry that someone might be surprised that an action on > the results of a search has the effect of deleting an article > permanently from its original group? But you might say the same thing > about moving articles. Yes, I don't think users will be surprised that deleting an article in the nnir group makes it go away forever. I mean, that's what they're queried for on `B DEL'. > But this means that gnus-summary-expire-articles is called on > the nnir group upon summary-buffer exit. But this is only called with the "E"-marked articles. I guess if the user sets the "E" mark on nnir articles, they probably know that it's in danger of being deleted. But I don't think anybody will do that, really... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen