From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57621 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kohkichi Hosoda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam does not move Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:16:13 +0900 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86brkl921y.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> <4nfz9wcmuq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085145432 19819 80.91.224.253 (21 May 2004 13:17:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 13:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6161@lists.math.uh.edu Fri May 21 15:16:58 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BR9tR-0001wW-00 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 15:16:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BR9t0-0004cn-00; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BR9ss-0004ch-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:16:22 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BR9sr-0004fr-Jp for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp4.dti.ne.jp (smtp4.dti.ne.jp [202.216.228.39]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAD43A0041 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:16:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from venus.dti.ne.jp (PPPa63.hyogo-ip.dti.ne.jp [210.159.247.63]) by smtp4.dti.ne.jp (3.08s) with ESMTP id i4LDGGrg023257 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 22:16:17 +0900 (JST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nfz9wcmuq.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "19 May 2004 14:07:09 -0400") Original-Lines: 37 User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.3 (based on No Gnus v0.3) Mule-UCS/0.85 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?R0lOU0hBREFOOhskQjZkOjsbKEIgGyRCRmcbKEI=?=) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3.50 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.3.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57621 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57621 I think I figured out something I missed. What I tried was the followings; When I found spam mail marked with "o" in ham group, I marked it with M-d. It did not move to spam group when I exit the summary buffer of the ham group. On the other hand, the working procedure is the followings; 1. Remove marks from "o"-spam with M-c in ham group 2. Exit the summary buffer 3. Re-enter the ham group 4. Mark the spam with M-d and exit the summary buffer 5. Spam moves to spam group And *Messages* are Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules Registering 5 articles as spam using backend spam-use-stat Moving to nnml:spam: (7165 7137 7089 7088 7086)... Wrote /Users/kohkichi/Mail/spam/19874 Wrote /Users/kohkichi/Mail/spam/19875 Wrote /Users/kohkichi/Mail/spam/19876 Wrote /Users/kohkichi/Mail/spam/19877 Wrote /Users/kohkichi/Mail/spam/19878 5 spam messages are marked as expired and moved it to nnml:spam Of course, new spam in the ham group move to the spam group if it is marked with M-d. I would like to know if this is the right way Gnus works. Thank you for your help. -- Kohkichi Hosoda E-mail address: khosoda@venus.dti.ne.jp http://www.venus.dti.ne.jp/~khosoda/Enlightenment.html