From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37654 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Like (display . all) but hide expirable messages Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:28:48 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Message-ID: References: <87n15953w6.fsf@TK212017118241.teleweb.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173028 14958 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:03:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27449 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2001 21:28:49 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2001 21:28:49 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 2359 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2001 21:29:10 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87n15953w6.fsf@TK212017118241.teleweb.at> (Leonard Stiles's message of "09 Aug 2001 23:18:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 19 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37654 Leonard Stiles writes: > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: >> People who want to use Gnus like other mail readers want Gnus to >> always show all mails, except the deleted ones. Since expirable >> messages are deleted, in a sense, it would be nice to provide a >> (display . most) feature which does this. >=20 > Or make display more flexible: let it take a list of symbols > representing article marks. If the car of the list is 'not, the sense > of the match is inverted. >=20 > e.g. (display . (not read expirable)) to get the behaviour you suggest. To take it even further, e.g.: (display . (and (not expire) (or tick (not read)))) But this might be more than is worthwhile. paul