From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36483 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: 27 May 2001 19:02:28 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: References: <01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.163305edt.115259@gateway.intersys.com> <01May25.161238edt.115273@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172059 8831 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20373 invoked by alias); 27 May 2001 23:02:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 20368 invoked from network); 27 May 2001 23:02:30 -0000 Original-Received: from h0060978d8c91.ne.mediaone.net (HELO peorth.gweep.net) (ratinox@24.147.75.115) by gnus.org with SMTP; 27 May 2001 23:02:30 -0000 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by peorth.gweep.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA06144; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:02:28 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36483 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36483 * prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) on Sun, 27 May 2001 | It may. Or it may not, depending on what the admin wants. Nothing is | necessarily broken with a server that accepts mail addressed to | foo.com but rejects mail addressed to bar.foo.com. Then foo.com's mail gateway should masqerade mail headers so that nobody outside ever sees bar.foo.com. If it does not, and there is no server that accepts mail for bar.foo.com, then the whole site is configured badly. [...] | But you would require Gnus to use the hostname where the message | originated, right? You've said this is a consequence of *some* | requirement of 2822; show it to us. If Gnus is generating headers automatically, then yes, that is what it should use. It is up to the site's mail gateway to masqerade what needs to be masqeraded. [...] | Wrong. You're trying to apply too much intelligence - the "address" | is just that; you don't have to figure out what they really meant (in | this case). E.g., "prj@[129.22.4.2]". Anyway, this is just one | possible form of address; requirements on one form don't necessarily | apply to other forms of addresses. Now you are deliberately being a pain in the ass. -- Rat \ If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ away immediately. Seek shelter and cover PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ head.