From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36107 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jason R. Mastaler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mail-Followup-To not only for wide replies considered harmful Date: 03 May 2001 12:58:30 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87lmoexvfv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171748 6800 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:42:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 29739 invoked by alias); 3 May 2001 18:58:40 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 29734 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 18:58:39 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (HELO nightshade.la.mastaler.com) (jason@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 May 2001 18:58:39 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 19648 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2001 18:58:31 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: "Whz7py/hGVg+:}u&Q$/5z>j)gy%qNRX{j]0xGF&?Z"^b3`[6dY'^jSDlZDHh$m1~YX6U3J 1gOce%&je3)lVMOa/P,=9Kj:lmZb6]1hMmam*SW$GrVPa>b05y9/svb[uX.i><]^; iE1^(p_*=eLQJ6g$[aOX9I#`DCP\^O=RR:7|95hZ In-Reply-To: <87lmoexvfv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "03 May 2001 18:13:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA v0.11/Python 2.1 Original-Lines: 7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36107 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36107 Another thought about Mail-Followup-To: -- shouldn't the default be to honor Mail-Followup-To instead of prompting the user as is the case currently? Mail-Copies-To is automatically honored by Gnus. -- (TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/) (OSI-certified SPAM reduction system)