From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26632
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MULE problem?
Date: 11 Nov 1999 15:20:43 +0100
Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3emdxun2c.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
References: <vafaeombu3v.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <xknvh79sbg9.fsf@tahkokari.cs.Helsinki.FI>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163805 20457 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:30:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA18171
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:17:53 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB04952;
	Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:17:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:18:00 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA04929
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:17:49 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (quimby.gnus.org [193.69.4.139])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA18164
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:17:18 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from news@localhost)
	by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA08910
	for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:19:28 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-Lines: 17
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 942329968 11108 193.69.4.148 (11 Nov 1999 14:19:28 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Nov 1999 14:19:28 GMT
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Now-Playing: Front Line Assembly's _Hard Wired_: "Circuitry"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida)
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26632
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26632

Janne Rinta-Manty <jrm@iki.fi> writes:

> I noticed this: when I select a group with C-u RET RET (all articles),
> _all_ authors and subjects are OK, but selecting a group "normally"
> results _sometimes_ in the \nnn garbage (but _never_ in new articles).
> 
> The funny thing is that it doesn't happen always, and in the same
> summary buffer some names or subjects are OK (cached?) and others are
> not.

This sounds like it could be cache-related.  Can you see whether there 
really is a pattern here -- that those articles that come directly
from nnspool are wonky, and those from the cache are ok?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen