From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21548 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Get \201 when I edit mail Date: 26 Feb 1999 07:58:19 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159631 23522 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:20:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA01395 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 03:03:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB06583; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 02:01:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 26 Feb 1999 02:01:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA01864 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 01:59:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp007.uio.no [129.240.240.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA01213 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 02:59:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA23720; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:58:58 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Italo Calvinos _Usynlige byer_ X-Now-Playing: Pieter Nooten & Michael Brook's _Sleeps With The Fishes_: "Time" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "21 Feb 1999 12:31:43 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070078 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.78) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I guess that Mule would appear easier if people, like me, knew > better where to find some full documentation for it. Yesyesyes! But there isn't any, really. > We often underestimate the importance of having complete, legible, > properly updated documentation in the success of a package, or the speed > of acceptance. Indeed. I don't think the importance of (good and/or complete) documentation can be overestimated. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen