From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20986 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Get \201 when I edit mail Date: 04 Feb 1999 17:57:08 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159178 20663 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:12:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13535 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:18:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB08366; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:12:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 04 Feb 1999 11:12:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA09017 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:11:31 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp023.uio.no [129.240.240.24]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13203 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:11:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA00895; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 18:10:49 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Sheri S. Tepper's _The Family Tree_ X-Now-Playing: Circus Modern's _Trøst_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Michael Welsh Duggan's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 1999 04:23:25 GMT" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070076 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.76) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > The MML tags are uneditable (by default), and hitting `RET' or > clicking on the tag brings up the part in a seperate buffer > (unencoded). Hm... Well, I don't see why the tags should be uneditable -- why not let people change, say, the filename parameter if they wish? Of course, they may then do something wrong and ruin the tag, but that must surely be their business. :-) But the bit about bringing up the unencoded part in a separate buffer I like. > Of course, you should be able to kill tags and their related parts as > well, and have an easy way to restore them before saving changes... If the tags are gone, then the parts won't be included in the edited message, which sounds right to me. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen