From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19046 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Postponed Emacs actions Date: 22 Nov 1998 08:03:45 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157467 9549 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:44:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA28810 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 02:12:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB04407; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 01:11:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 22 Nov 1998 01:11:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA23510 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 01:11:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp077.uio.no [129.240.240.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA28754 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 02:10:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA11172; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 08:18:22 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Greg Bear's _Slant_ X-Now-Playing: New Grape's _New Grape_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Simon Josefsson's message of "21 Nov 1998 15:59:40 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070054 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.54) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Doesn't the tty optimization help? When expiring big groups over a > modem, I only see every hundred (or so) 'Expring article 32423'. I usually run Emacs under X, which flutters oodles when entering a group on a fast machine. > Also, couldn't the base64 decoder be a little bit more verbose? Right > now my Emacs hangs for minutes on bigish attachments. A `Decoding > base64..........' message where the dot grows just like nntp would be > very neat. Or should I just wait for a Emacs with built-in > base64-decoding? I think the latter is easier, since Emacs 20.4 will have the base64 things in the C layer. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen