From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11664 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eze Ogwuma Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: compatibility of nnml and MH Date: 16 Jul 1997 17:08:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151337 31741 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:02:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA09143 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 10:41:20 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA16940 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 12:39:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 18:09:35 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 9343 invoked by uid 504); 16 Jul 1997 16:09:33 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 9340 invoked from network); 16 Jul 1997 16:09:29 -0000 Original-Received: from eogwama-d.cs.ucl.ac.uk (HELO typhoon.ncc.co.uk) (zcaceog@128.16.32.73) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 1997 16:09:27 -0000 Original-Received: (from zcaceog@localhost) by typhoon.ncc.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA25901; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 17:08:22 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "16 Jul 1997 08:51:51 -0600" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.63/XEmacs 20.2 Original-Lines: 27 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:2054 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11664 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11664 Jason R Mastaler writes: > Eze Ogwuma writes: > > > Actually this depends on how many articles you have had in a group > > overall. If nnmh has writes article numbers above 9999 then mh will > > not see the numbers correctly. It will put a ? into the number scheme. > > > > There was some discussion about re-numbering articles in nnm? groups a > > while back but I don't remember the outcome. > > So, is there a way to re-number articles in an nnmh group? (from > within Gnus) This would be the equivalent of "packing" a folder > with MH/nmh. > > Compacting a Folder > The `-pack' switch will compress the message names in the > designated folders, removing holes in message numbering. I might be wrong but I recall that the only solution was to re-spool all the articles to another folder then back again. I'm not sure how this would affect ticked articles. -- Eze Ogwuma