From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75107 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: latest sources do not client-split IMAP anymore Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:13:59 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <8739q0tdai.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <87fwtz4vfj.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <8762uun3lg.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292516108 23036 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2010 16:15:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:15:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23462@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 16 17:15:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGTq-00056S-OM for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGTJ-0002an-VQ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:14:26 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGTI-0002aU-GR for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:14:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGTD-0000zn-Mt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:14:24 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGT9-0003Wh-VL for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:15 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGT9-0004dS-NT for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:15 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:15 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:14:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEXiw/HVteT11/xpSnq4 mMfKqdief6yJF3H7AAACZUlEQVQ4jV1Uy3LbMAwENVbORCP6TCtN740zOkcNyHPUkLp3JPP/P6EL Wn4kGGtkCQR3sQuKyrFGKWUppUcc+hrEb2SJW5dD5HSfKMMaSxGRWJpdlpyTSJASyIyGXc54NfOM m0SRzNnSuoacHSO63nsiJ0kAWCitKWMFNnhflMKgb8syEI/uX8fWcO6mvZu4BnVMeXwcH+duLcv+ 9J7iSVLmkZHo/z69PS2/Psr7/ndaPl9eQLcBZ2rX/fDw6P6k/ek1LJ/y2m8JsrjjZ/yhH8mQ9Xjy O6LjLcoWy/G4FOqv4fVCJ9iFdkyyymWlBO1cIySm+bLRsECxnEPKUyoxEmqJAG8suoPOtp1UOoAP G94lFjUGWlGFP2gd+ca4sgYVlKiUWFZJ7Cye7ZSDdRButrDvzraNN1ELzgcCySJwykmeGMCprJHJ gEBDLdF9jWqlVqrh5zZP8dIt9eYbht8qgGHI70wO7EROEuOaJHSJPlrHLqUJKmGOgoJnl+dMF7D+ O7iapH98o2vINpdWNhLYgEXS+ANjCkfcRP3zRsV/ab6nZqdyQ2mZGtL5rhohcTYJm8XA4Em6JHAX qTlcu1Lw5sbqYCxP0E8E82m9ZkyKcj8+X4Kmrk4xdFGJk2DuS54yZOpstbVlBj0HWryrrfY/yVR3 mJPqpB7ABKHbfAx6cHDVezmDQ1XHxhEMxcYPFVXLM3i2VsFrnOnchPamOSdaLbsmnpurgnhrmEpc RTByUSY9/HlSk3V4/Vb0rOerr4r4apRcBnoot8AJoXpMtCt8ETAOsqoDWAv9z6e+q6owPhJ5xtQt /wHFnNhygOOVOgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Electrelane's _Singles, B-Sides & Live_: "I've Been Your Fan Since Yesterday" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:smGbSP9U+GcchRUUSGXd5bRFexQ= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75107 Archived-At: Tibor Simko writes: >> (gnus-read-active-file nil nil) >> >> is IMAP mail split? > > If I launch gnus-git-master and I eval this, then no, it is not split. > > If I launch gnus-git-master-with-the-cited-patch and I eval this, then > yes, it is split. That's even more incomprehensible. Your patch just put (gnus-read-active-file nil nil) into `gnus-setup-news'. The patch doesn't do anything to `gnus-read-active-file' itself, so I don't really understand this at all. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen