Re: gnus-parameters and (visible . t) problem

["Jochen Küpper" <jochen-+It19tn3Rl9sbm7dSapR3bNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>]

> bojohan+news-dtrdnu4G8ymci/EUP2OQSw@public.gmane.org (Johan Bockgård) writes:

[...correctly points out gnus-permanently-visible-groups...]

So what;s about the following documentaiton-enhancement?

Greetings,
Jochen
-- 
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit                http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
    Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité                GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D
        (Part 3 you find in my messages before fall 2003.)



Index: texi/gnus.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/texi/gnus.texi,v
retrieving revision 7.95
diff -u -u -r7.95 gnus.texi
--- texi/gnus.texi      30 Mar 2005 08:17:03 -0000      7.95
+++ texi/gnus.texi      23 Jun 2005 22:09:04 -0000
@@ -2764,6 +2764,9 @@
 that group will always be visible in the Group buffer, regardless
 of whether it has any unread articles.

+This parameter cannot be set via @code{gnus-parameters}. See
+@code{gnus-permanently-visible-groups} as an alternative.
+
 @item broken-reply-to
 @cindex broken-reply-to
 Elements like @code{(broken-reply-to . t)} signals that @code{Reply-To}
@@ -3055,7 +3058,8 @@

 @vindex gnus-parameters
 Group parameters can be set via the @code{gnus-parameters} variable too.
-But some variables, such as @code{visible}, have no effect.  For
+But some variables, such as @code{visible}, have no effect (For this
+case see @code{gnus-permanently-visible-groups} as an alternative.). For
 example:

 @lisp