From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51236 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el and Procmail splitting strategy? Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:42:38 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049551255 8125 80.91.224.249 (5 Apr 2003 14:00:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Sat Apr 05 16:00:53 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191oE0-00026Y-00 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:00:53 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 191oDx-0005US-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:00:49 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:01:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (ip64-157-176-121.neutelligent.com [64.157.176.121]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA28683 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 08:01:42 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 53657 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2003 14:00:33 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 53652 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2003 14:00:33 -0000 Original-Received: from ns3.beld.net (208.229.215.83) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2003 14:00:33 -0000 Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (unknown [24.233.82.91]) by ns3.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9F03BF53; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:00:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Jody Klymak X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Jody Klymak , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Jody Klymak's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:38:41 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51236 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51236 On Wed, 02 Apr 2003, jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu wrote: > I split on my IMAP server using procmail. But I get spam in both my > Inbox and on of the mailboxes I procmail into, lets call one of them > "bbdb." What is the best strategy for cleaning this up using > spam.el? Hmm, spam.el assumes a single incoming point (with spam-split). Have you tried making nnimap-split-inbox a list of strings? That would defeat your procmail splitting, of course. > The following works great for my Inbox. But, of course, doesn't do > anything for "bbdb". > (require 'spam) > (setq > nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy > nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX" > nnimap-split-fancy '(| > (: spam-split) > ;; default mailbox > "mail/Inbox.spam")) > > I'd prefer to be able to split using procmail on the server, but I > guess I'd like gnus to check for spam when it enters a group? > > If its not doable, thats fine. I'll split in gnus. Well, I was thinking of a 'respool spam/ham process destination, as suggested before, which would resubmit the spam/ham mail to the spool process from any mailbox. Would that work for you? I think it would be easier in the end to keep splitting on the client side with spam.el. Ted